I did update Yootheme to the latest version before trying the migration, like I did with every other extension - either I removed the ones that weren't compatible anymore or I updated them to be compatible. The version that you are now seeing is the one from the restored backup, which I had taken before updating the template or other extensions. The Joomla Update component was showing all green and only one yellow when I first tried the update (PHP Output buffering was On rather than off which I couldn't figure out how to change).This update seem to have seriously failed. FPA report shows the Joomla version as 3.10.12 but you have a mix of 3.10 and 4.x/5.x templates. Protostar, beez3,Hathor, Isis are from Joomla 3.x or earlier. Cassiopeia and Atum are J4/J5.
I don't know how you 'updated' but you should let Joomla Update take care of the full process. See https://docs.joomla.org/Joomla_3.x_to_4 ... _Migration for additional help, ensuring you have followed this to the letter.
Also the Yootheme template may have been a contributing factor - the FPA shows v2.3.15 of "Yootheme" (which I assume is "Yootheme Pro" (https://yootheme.com/page-builder) which includes the page builder and template.
Update Yootheme 2.3.15 if required (that seems to be at least 4 years out of date). The most recent release is v4.4.8 (Aug 2024), according to the Yootheme website changelog for that template (https://yootheme.com/support/yootheme-pro/changelog)).
Switch to the default template (Cassiopeia) and see if that gives you a working site, then work to fix Yootheme with an updated version if it is available or remove that completely if not.
I would restore a backup and start over, and remove Yootheme completely The compromise may be rebuilding the site after a successful update but I think the only work involved would be reconfiguring the modules to the correct template module positions.
All other websites migrated from J3.10.12 to J4 without any issue and we use the same hosting company, PHP settings and Yootheme Pro for all of them, without any issue. The only difference with this one was that this was very old and had been initially created with J2, so my guess is that the database schema didn't fix properly (none of the other websites needed a database fix).
Statistics: Posted by lrdho — Wed Sep 18, 2024 12:27 pm
